Foot in Touch

Entries categorized as ‘Ireland’

Does Howley’s promotion open the door for Ashton?

April 20, 2012 · Leave a Comment

 

Will Howley stay with Wales when Gatland leads the Lions?

Jack Lewars

The news that Rob Howley will lead Wales’ tour to Australia after Warren Gatland’s recent domestic accident is fairly mundane.  Its wider implications, however, are not.

It is considered all but certain that Gatland will appoint Shaun Edwards and Graham Rowntree as his defence and forwards coaches for next year’s Lions tour.  What is not clear is who will fill the role of attack coach.  While Gatland could take this on himself, he is primarily a forwards coach and strategist, not someone who coaches the technical side of attack.  This leaves an intriguing gap in the Lions coaching make-up.

The obvious candidate is Rob Howley.  He is Wales’ attack guru and was on the 2009 Lions tour along with the three aforementioned coaches.  However, he has already been named as the joint leader (along with Robin McBryde) of the Welsh team in 2013, when Gatland will be on his Lions sabbatical year.  This includes not only the 6 Nations but also the summer tour to Japan, which coincides with the Lions fixtures Down Under.

It is not impossible, of course, that Howley could still travel with the Lions.  Being named as the caretaker of Wales does not prohibit being subsequently named as a Lions coach, and this may be thinking behind Robin McBryde’s joint appointment for the 6 Nations, especially as McBryde took charge of Wales’ 2009 tour to the USA in the absence of Gatland, Edwards and Howley.

If this is the expected progression, however, it seems rather strange that Howley has been given sole charge of Wales’ summer tour to Australia.  This would be a great chance to give McBryde further experience as the head guy, in preparation for his joint and then single custodianship next year.  Although it is firmly in the realms of speculation, it seems to me that Howley’s appointment for the 2012 Australia tour puts his Lions participation in doubt.

Regardless of the lack of certainty here, this gives an intriguing opportunity to muse about alternatives.  The unfortunate truth is that there really aren’t that many.  Scotland can’t buy a try at the moment, which probably discounts Gregor Townsend, although he has fine Lions pedigree as a player.  I’ve got to be honest and say that before researching piece I’d never actually heard of Gert Smal, who seems to be Ireland’s attack coach, so he would be a shock choice as well.

This apparent dearth of candidates adds considerable weight to the position of England attack coach.  After Andy Farrell decided to stay with Saracens (and, although his work on defence during the 6 Nations was outstanding, anyone who saw Sarries plug away at uninspiring plan A against Clermont for 80 minutes won’t be devastated to see him exit the frame), there has been much speculation about the final part of Lancaster’s preferred triumvirate structure.  Waikato Chiefs coach Wayne Smith is the favourite to get the job, especially after masterminding the All Blacks’ World Cup triumph, but he isn’t available until the Autumn.  This necessitates a temporary coach for the South Africa tour and if Stuart Lancaster has demonstrated anything, it’s that possession is nine-tenths of the law in coaching.

If Smith is the RFU and Lancaster’s first choice, it wouldn’t surprise me to see either of Mike Catt or Brian Ashton travel to South Africa.  Catt has international pedigree and is respected by the players, although he is relatively inexperienced and has not coached above club level.  Ashton, meanwhile, was the brain behind England’s unstoppable attack patterns in the Woodward era – something he did so successfully that he became England head coach and led them to a World Cup Final.  In many ways, and still assuming that Howley is unavailable, Ashton would be the most likely person to travel with the Lions, both on ability and pedigree.

Although this is largely speculation and educated guesswork, the thought of a Gatland – Ashton – Edwards – Rowntree coaching team is extremely exciting (not to mention Lancaster – Ashton – Rowntree for England).  There would also be a sense of justice in giving Ashton, a committed servant of the game and a revolutionary attacking thinker, the chance to redeem himself after his appalling treatment at the hands of the RFU in 2008.  Although it remains to seen whether Ashton is willing either to re-enter elite rugby or to talk to the RFU again, he did suggest himself as an interim coach for both the 6 Nations and the South Africa tour in the press.  This suggests that a shot at redemption might just be as appealing to him as it is to the rest of us.

Categories: 6 Nations · Australia · British and Irish Lions · Coaches · England · Ireland · Scotland · Wales
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Team of the Year 2011

December 23, 2011 · 1 Comment

By Ciaran McAuley

As the year comes to a close, here is my team of the year:

1. Tony Woodcock (New Zealand)
Provided a solid base for the New Zealand scrum and seemed to be everywhere on the pitch playing a major role in the demolition of the Wallabies pack in the World Cup.
Contenders: C Healy (Ireland), G Jenkins (Wales)

2. Bismarck du Plessis (South Africa)
Smit was lucky that Peter de Villiers had handed him the captaincy long before the World Cup, as du Plessis showed both in the Tri Nations and in the Super 14 that he is the best hooker in the world and should have started every game for South Africa.
Contenders: W Servat (France), K Mealamu (N Zealand)

3. Martin Castrogiovanni (Italy)
The cornerstone of a very strong Italian scrum, he caused problems to many teams both in the scrum and in the loose. One of the few Italians who could make it onto any country’s team.
Contenders: N Mas (France), A Jones (Wales)

4. Luke Charteris (Wales) & 5. Victor Matfield (South Africa)
Matfield laid down his mark as probably the best lock in the world while Charteris had the mobility of a back row player about the field, while both were dominant at the lineout.
Contenders: B Thorn (N Zealand), P O’Connell (Ireland), J Horwill (Australia), D Russouw (S Africa)

6. Sean O’Brien (Ireland)
The European Player of the Year rarely seemed to go backwards this year. Played a crucial part in Leinster’s Heineken Cup turnaround against Northampton, and was a surprisingly good replacement for Wallace at openside in the World Cup.
Contenders: J Kaino (N Zealand), S Burger (S Africa)

7. David Pocock (Australia)
Pocock exemplified why the openside flanker position is probably the most important in the game this year. Extremely strong in the contact areas and especially devastating at the ruck. Probably the only reason Australia beat South Africa in the quarter final.
Contenders: R McCaw (N Zealand), S Warburton (Wales), T Dusautoir (France)

8. Imanol Harinordoquy (France)
Solid performances throughout the 6 Nations, but really came into his own in the knockout stages of the World Cup. He somehow, almost single-handedly, dragged an awful French side to the final.
Contenders: S Parisse (Italy), K Read (N Zealand)

9. Mike Phillips (Wales)
Phillips’ sniping ability, partly due to being the size of a back row player, kept many teams on their toes and created space outside for his backs. If he keeps this up he will be almost guaranteed the 9 shirt on the Lions tour in 2 years time.
Contenders: W Genia (Australia)

10. Dan Carter (New Zealand)
Probably no other player in the world could cause such lament if they got injured. Despite only playing a few games in the World Cup, his performances in the Tri Nations have secured his place as the best fly-half in the world.
Contenders: Q Cooper (Australia), R Priestland (Wales), T Flood (England)

11. George North (Wales)
An upcoming star, this youngster has certainly not struggled with international rugby. Another strong, fast runner, he has proved to be an asset to an impressive Welsh side. North will be someone to keep a close eye on in the future.
Contenders: D Ioane (Australia), S Williams (Wales)

12. Ma’a Nonu (New Zeland)
Few inside centres can master a defence, crash a ball up, run around the outside, create gaps and offload like Nonu can. Perhaps one of the fiercest players on the pitch, his commitment throughout this year was huge, and gave Henry little doubt over not selecting Sonny-Bill Williams.
Contenders: J Roberts (Wales), J De Villiers (S Africa)

13. Brian O’Driscoll (Ireland)
Quite possibly a biased selection on behalf of an Irishman, but O’Driscoll put in some massive performances both in the 6 Nations and in the World Cup. Slower than he used to be, he plays a key role in Ireland’s defence and his potency in attack is due to the number of players he draws.
Contenders: M Tuilagi (England), C Smith (N Zealand)

14. Chris Ashton (England)
Ashton’s performance during the 6 Nations was devastating to say the least. With superb support lines, Ashton was one of the key players to England’s 6 Nations victory. He also managed to score 6 tries during the Rugby World Cup, equalling with Vincent Clerc to be the top try scorer.
Contenders: V Clerc (France), O’ Connor (Australia), R Kahui (N Zealand)

15. Kurtley Beale (Australia)
Beale produced some outstanding performances during the Tri Nations, helping Australia to a perhaps surprising victory. When entering the line he is both strong and fast, providing a deadly extra man in attack. Though Australia did not quite perform in the World Cup, he still showed glimpses of his ability.
Contenders: I Dagg (New Zealand), L Halfpenny (Wales), B Foden (England)

Many selections were close, so feel free to give your thoughts on how the side could have been improved.

Categories: All Blacks · Australia · British and Irish Lions · England · France · Ireland · Italy · South Africa · Wales

The Lions – what next?

November 7, 2011 · 1 Comment

Jack Lewars and Chris Gollop

The next in our ‘what next’ series takes a look at the British and Irish Lions.  It’s worth pointing out right at the start, of course, that the chances of this being the actual Lions’ team are incredibly slim – even forgetting form and fitness, two years is a long time in international rugby.  To give an illustrative example, a proposed Lions team at the end of the 2007 World Cup would never have included Jamie Roberts, a recent Osprey’s debutant, and he was Man of the Series in 2009.  It would also have been a brave man who put money on Simon Shaw making the tour, let alone giving one of the greatest ever performances at lock in the second test.

With those caveats in mind, however, we thought it’d be interesting (not to mention fun) to have a stab at a Lions squad, based on World Cup form and pedigree.  We have also included some speculative possibilities, so that we’ll look brilliant if we’re right.

The Coach

A slightly tricky one, here.  Sir Ian McGeechan can basically have the job whenever he wants but he has categorically ruled out a return to the Lions fold.  Assuming this wasn’t another Steve Redgrave moment, the leading candidate at the moment would be Warren Gatland, given Wales’ glittering World Cup.  With uncertainty over Johnson’s position at England, there is always the chance that someone could take over there and impress in the next two seasons, and the currently-unemployed trio of Jake White, Nick Mallett and (most especially) Graham Henry would all be in the frame.  Henry is the coach with the greatest current standing, but he also managed to lose a Lions test series in 2001 that really, really should have been won.

Front Row – Cian Healey, Matthew Rees, Adam Jones

Probably a slightly easier area to predict than most, given that ‘Prop rockets to stardom’ is a fairly rare headline.  Adam Jones remains the best tighthead prop in the world, and has Lions pedigree, so you’d back him to be starting.  On the other side, the two leading lights at present are Gethin Jenkins and the much-improved Cian Healey.  Although Jenkins has Lions experience, we fancy Healey as the younger man.  The hooker position is uncertain, with no one making an irrefutable claim, but Matthew Rees is a fine player and will want his Wales captaincy back as he returns from injury.   In terms of up-and-coming candidates, any of Dan Cole,  Matt Stevens and the versatile Alex Corbisiero could stake a claim, and Ross Ford might be the dark horse at hooker.

Locks – Luke Charteris, Richie Gray

Luke Charteris’ performances at the recent World Cup set just about everyone purring with admiration, so he’s straight on the current team sheet.  Richie Gray has consistently been one of Scotland’s best performers and his mobility in the loose would be well-suited to Australia’s faster pitches.  If Courtney Lawes can rediscover the form of last Autumn, he will be one of the best second-rows in the world, but he hasn’t looked settled since the Six Nations, and his thumping defence is starting to look a little more like Henry Tuilagi’s than Jonny Wilkinson’s (he was yellow-carded on his return to Northampton last week).  With Ireland and England both looking to refresh their aged packs, however, new players could well emerge here in the next season.

Back row – Sean O’Brien, Sam Warburton, Toby Faletau

There is an absolute abundance of riches here, and balance will be the key in 2009.  We considered and rejected Tom Croft, who was awesome for the 2009 Lions, James Haskell, who has serious potential at 6 or 8, and Stephen Ferris, who is easily the best blindside flanker in the home nations.  The controversy will of course be in selecting Sean O’Brien out of position – a different coach might want specialists in every position, in which case there is the mother of shoot-outs between Warburton and O’Brien at 7.  Either way, it is a fearsomely physical back row, one which can carry, tackle all day and smash the breakdown to pieces.  Faletau is one of the finds of the year, and it is difficult to envisage anyone surging ahead of him.

Half-backs – Mike Phillips, Rhys Priestland

Phillips on form is the best number 9 in the world – better than Du Preez and better than Genia.  He is physical in attack and defence, a good distributor and a great runner, as he showed with some crucial solo tries in the World Cup.  He will need to stay on form to fend off Ben Youngs and Rory Lawson, but he would be favourite at the moment.  He will also consider Danny Care a threat, who was in superb form before injury curtailed his summer.  Our pick for the unexpected contender would be Joe Simpson, however – he is absolutely blisteringly quick, far more so than Youngs or Care, both of whom can turn on the afterburners.  If England use him correctly, he could be what Genia is to Australia, but the word is that it’d need a change in management for his intuitive style to be valued.

At fly-half, Sexton and Hook are both possibilities, but the former has question-marks over his kicking and the latter will be lucky to get a decent run in the position.  Rhys Priestland has been integral to Wales’ resurgence, and has a lovely mix of tactical kicking and flat, threatening distribution.  He also plays with Phillips and Roberts (see below) for Wales, which advances his claim.

Centres – Jamie Roberts, Manu Tuilagi

Roberts showed in 2009 what he can do to defences, and he rediscovered his best form just in time for the World Cup.  He is a brutal runner who creates space for those around him and is the closest thing to a Ma’a Nonu in the Northern Hemisphere (although he can’t pass or kick, yet – it probably doesn’t come up too often when you’re over 17 stone).  Outside him, Tuilagi’s pace and power would be utterly destructive.  He was one of England’s only success stories, and a broken cheek bone won’t keep him from adding tries and caps to his tally.  It is difficult to see anyone else ousting these two if their form continues as it is currently.  There is always the possibility that Tuilagi will have beheaded some unsuspecting opponent, however, in which case Jonathan Davies might sneak into the test team.

Back three – George North, Leigh Halfpenny, Ben Foden

This is the most volatile of the selections, as your wingers in particular are selected mainly on form.  North has had just about every superlative in the book thrown at him in the last two months, although we feel he has yet to prove his pedigree against the top teams.  He would still be starting, however, if the first test was tomorrow.  The other wing could be any number of people – Keith Earls, Ugo Monye and Tommy Bowe were on the 2009 tour; Christian Wade and Charlie Sharples continue to light up the Premiership; and Max Evans has a serious turn of pace for Scotland.  Sticking strictly to current form, Leigh Halfpenny had an excellent World Cup and was just one foot short of kicking Wales into the final, with his 2009 experience and versatility in his favour.  If we’re honest, though, Chris Ashton’s dip in form is largely because England have forgotten how to break the gain line – there’s no one like him for finishing a half-break, and he could run riot with Tuilagi and Roberts creating gaps inside him.  Despite his and England’s poor showing at the World Cup, Ashton still finished as the joint highest try-scorer in the tournament, which is truly astonishing.

At full-back, James Hook is again unlucky to be excluded, but Ben Foden has quietly been one of the most consistent full-backs in the world for two years – rock solid defence, a good decision-maker, very quick and capable of simply smashing players into oblivion when he runs into them.  His try against France was a reminder of his class, and he would complete an exciting and threatening back three.

 

So there you go – a bloody good fifteen.  Particularly exciting is the quality in key positions, such as the back row,the  scrum-half and the centres, although Priestland is not yet a world-class number 10.  Feel free to add your thoughts, challenges and corrections, or simply post your alternative XV.

Categories: Australia · British and Irish Lions · England · Ireland · Scotland · Wales
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

7th Heaven

October 14, 2011 · Leave a Comment

So the quarter-finals have come and gone, and I’ve given it a week before posting anything in case my next contribution just turned into a long, disappointed diatribe about how poor England were.  The World Cup campaign of Johnson’s team was, overall, fairly calamitous, as they failed to make friends on or off the pitch.  I, along with the coaching staff, players and a large part of the rugby public, was somehow fooled into thinking that you can win a World Cup playing badly, which of course you can’t.  You don’t have to be the best team in tournament; you don’t have to score the most tries; but you can’t play badly and win a World Cup.  So England got what they deserved, and the Rugby World Cup is probably richer for it, as teams in better form progress into the semi-finals (with the exception of France, who remain terrible).

Onto the semi-finals then, and the battle of the opensides.  It’s always dangerous to focus too much on individuals in what is the ultimate team game, but I agree with a large number of learned commentators who are talking about the semi-finals as direct battles between opposing flankers – Warburton vs Dusautoir and, even more enticingly, Pocock vs McCaw.  Whilst it would be an exaggeration to say that these clashes will decide the game, it would be extremely surprising if the winner of each of these clashes were to end up on the losing side.

A good number 7 is, of course, one of the things that England lack.  Throughout the tournament, there has been a continuing debate about the value of a genuine openside flanker in the team.  This has been prompted by teams such as England and Ireland, both quarter-finalists, who travelled without a first-choice specialist in that position.  Originally, I was tempted to reconfigure this debate along the lines of ‘traditional’ and ‘modern’ numbers 7s.  This sees the traditional player as a slightly smaller, very quick player whose speciality is causing problems at the breakdown and slowing down opposition ball (if you want a paradigm of this type of player, you couldn’t find much better than Neil Back).  The modern 7, meanwhile, is a player like James Haskell or Sean O’Brien – not necessarily a sneaky operator who gets under opposition bodies at the ruck, but a powerful, mobile jack-of-all-trades who focuses on a high tackle count and puts himself about, without worrying too much about the darker side of the position.

Reading the situation thus, I didn’t take it too seriously when commentators pointed to England’s lack of specialist openside as a weakness.  After all, if you look at a position and James Haskell is filling it, there doesn’t seem to be too much of a problem.  But it isn’t that players like Haskell and O’Brien aren’t good rugby players or that they don’t try hard enough – it’s that a genuine, ‘traditional’, died-in-the-wool number 7 gives you something that no other player can, even if they have that number on their shirt.  The ability to turn over opposition ball, or at least to slow it down, is the defining characteristic of a good openside flanker – and it is something that England, in particular, missed hugely in this World Cup.

The two biggest quarter-finals last week were decided by openside flankers.  Ireland vs Wales was a titanic clash which the Welsh eventually won reasonably comfortably.  This was in a large part down to Sam Warburton’s success in nullifying the carrying threat of Sean O’Brien, his opposite number.  If O’Brien had created the sort of momentum that he has against just about everyone in the last 10 months, Wales would have lost.  Instead, the day was carried by Warburton’s tireless tackling (I heard an unconfirmed report that he had made 16 tackles by half-time alone) and his ability to win crucial turnovers when Ireland were camped on the Welsh line (notably in the early stages, when Ireland failed twice to take points having been camped on the Welsh line).  O’Brien is a very good flanker but is naturally a 6.  Although his freakish strength and mobility mean that he could never be considered a weak link, it is telling that Warburton’s impact ultimately outweighed that of the bigger, more brutal player.

If Warburton’s effect on the Welsh game was considerable, however, then David Pocock’s influence against South Africa was seismic.  Somehow, despite having no possession, no territory and a kicking game that resembled an under-16s training exercise, Australia managed to come away with a win.  South Africa had 75% territorial domination – 75%! – and yet were unable to convert pressure into points, largely because of Pocock’s work on the back foot.  Despite not playing the entire match, the Queensland player made 29 tackles and stole possession 9 times, truly astonishing figures.  With the South Africans’ own breakdown specialist, Heinrich Brussow, leaving the field injured in the first half, this was almost certainly the area of the game that went the furthest to deciding the match.

In my mind at least, therefore, this tournament has conclusively demonstrated not only the value of but also the necessity of a talented, specialist number 7 in any world class team.  It is no coincidence that Warburton, McCaw, Pocock and Dusautoir (an often under-estimated player) have carried their teams to the semi-finals and it has shown that, however good the replacement is, you cannot swap a 7 for a 6 without losing something from your game.  The challenge now for those sides without such a player is to find one and to promote him, quickly.  It would take a brave man to drop two of Wallace, Ferris and O’Brien in favour of a less rounded, specialist openside, and the same is true when weighing up Haskell, Wood and Moody.  If England are to start a meaningful assault on the top of world rugby, however, they’re going to need to do it with David Seymour, of Sale, or Carl Fearns, of Bath, playing a prominent role in their starting XV.

Categories: All Blacks · Australia · France · Ireland · RWC 2011 · South Africa · Wales
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Quarter-final preview

October 6, 2011 · Leave a Comment

The Celtic clash between Ireland and Wales is the best of a cracking quarter-final lineup

In a Rugby World Cup group game, the average winning margin is 28 points.  In a knock-out game, it is 14 points.  In a final, it is 10 points, and three finals have been decided by less than one score.

The newspaper in which I read those statistics used them as evidence that knock-out rugby is boring.  I strongly suspect the correspondent was a football fan, because the actual reason is quite the opposite – it gets close in the quarter-finals because that’s when the best teams start playing each other.  This is where it gets fascinating.

While there are those who will complain that the competition has again failed to produce a group-stage upset, it is difficult to be too downhearted about this because it guarantees an immense weekend of rugby.  The obvious weak link is Argentina, who are extremely unlikely to overcome New Zealand (30/1 last I checked), but then Dan Carter thoughtfully ruptured a tendon he never knew he had, giving the game huge resonance for Colin Slade and those who put their house on the All Blacks instead of a pension plan.  I for one will be tuning in with rapt attention, not only to see if Slade can fill the winged sandals of Carter but also to seize upon the first sign of choking, spluttering or even mild heart burn from the men in black.

Elsewhere, England and France will renew an historic rivalry with both sides looking to improve.  This may turn out to be hubristic, but I make England heavy, heavy favourites.  Not only have England won 4 from 4, including two games that thoroughly resembled knock-out rugby, they also have pedigree in this type of game.  Add to that the abject form of the French, the deteriorating relationship between coach and players, their weird selection and the psychological impact of a certain J Wilkinson, and I will be astonished if England lose.  That said, it is a World Cup quarter final, and if ever there is a game where form goes out of the window, it’s a knock-out game in a World Cup.  France are always capable of a mercurial turnaround.  I just think that in this instance, it’s more unlikely than usual.

As if that wasn’t enough, the really mouthwatering clashes are the two I have yet to mention.  Australia vs South Africa will be titanic, with large numbers of travelling supporters set to create a pulsating atmosphere.  David Pocock against Heinrich Brussow, Will Genia against Fourie du Preez – huge clashes in a huge game.  Australia are favourites, having beaten South Africa in their last four meetings, but I actually fancy the Springboks to win.  Not only is this side the most experienced in their history, with 836 caps, it contains a number of players who are World Cup winners, where Australia have none.  Ireland showed that you can beat the Wallabies by kicking your goals and having a blanket defence, both strong facets of the South African game, and I expect that will have had a psychological impact.  The onus is on Australia to make the play quick and loose, and in the knock-out stages I always bet against the side who have to break free to win the game – it’s just not how knock-out rugby works.

That is in turn what makes the Celtic clash the pick of the round, as neither side should look to stifle the other.  Wales will never abandon their free-flowing style, regardless of circumstance, and a Northern Hemisphere opponent reduces the chance that they will execute badly because of nerves or psychological weakness.  Ireland, meanwhile, have the pack to play it tight, but they cut loose against Italy and their dynamic back row will want a broken game so that they can scavenge possession.  Although it would buck the trend of late-stage rugby, there is a genuine chance that we’ll see exciting, fast-paced, incisive rugby.  The last time Wales and Ireland met in an ultra-pressured game was the 6 Nations decider in 2009, and that was an absolute belter.  I really can’t pick a winner, although my heart just about says Wales.  Ultimately, whichever of the outstanding back rows wins the day will lead their side to victory, and Warburton against O’Brien is too close to call.

Categories: All Blacks · Argentina · Australia · England · France · Ireland · RWC 2011 · South Africa · Wales
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ireland rise whither England aspire

September 19, 2011 · Leave a Comment

Ireland celebrate a famous victory against Australia, putting them on course for a quarter-final against Wales

Another weekend, another round of thought-provoking rugby.  Some have said that we saw the best and worst of the World Cup, with Ireland’s stirring win over Australia counterbalancing England’s performance against Georgia.  Whilst I agree with the first part, however, I am not at all convinced by the latter.

What is certain is that Ireland have provided an excellent blueprint for beating Southern Hemisphere sides in the World Cup.  Australia were most people’s pick as New Zealand’s opponents in the final, as the TriNations finale saw them combine their usual attacking flair with a new-found physicality.  As so often in the past, however, one good performance from Australia’s forwards hath not a good pack made.  Ireland bullied the Wallabies up front, especially in the scrum, and questions will again be asked about their front row and ability at the breakdown in the absence of the preeminent David Pocock.

The really encouraging thing for other Northern Hemisphere sides is that Ireland were not brilliant.  They blew several good try-scoring opportunities, Sexton was poor with the boot and their outside backs failed to find or create space.  The one thing that they got absolutely right, however, was their defence.  Much like England in 2007, Ireland recognised the threat of the Wallaby backline and worked overtime on stifling it, creating a blanket of green which enveloped any attacks.  As long as this defensive system was working, they were always confident that they could manage Australia’s forwards and drag the Southern Hemisphere side into a kicking contest, which could only be to Ireland’s advantage.  The Australian pack did not manage to create momentum (always a hard ask against a pack which contains Sean O’Brien, Paul O’Connell, Jamie Heaslip and Stephen Ferris) and Cooper was reduced to trying trick passes as he strived for an opening.  When one of these went straight to Tommy Bowe, wasting the last meaningful field position that Australia gained, it was not a lucky escape, but a testament to the suffocating nature of the Irish defensive game.

There is an extent to which we should be cautious about saying that this game plan will beat any Sourthern Hemisphere side.  Australia are particularly vulnerable to it, because their forwards don’t make a lot of yards with their carrying and because they lack a rock solid goalkicker.  New Zealand are more muscular and have Dan Carter to punish any transgressions, and South Africa would relish a blood-and-guts battle of ten man rugby (indeed, the carrying of inside centre Frans Steyn against Fiji probably surpassed that of Australia’s front five).  I do think, though, that the Southern Hemisphere sides are less comfortable in tight games.  Their much-vaunted attacking rugby thrives in the Super 15, where some of the tackling is laughably poor, and in the TriNations, where two sides will come out fully expecting to score four tries each.  If a side comes out looking to kick their way to victory, however, even New Zealand’s game seems to suffer, as was shown in the Investec International against England last autumn.  This could be why the mercurial Welsh have such a poor record against the antipodes, where England in particular have had more success.

Which brings us to England, who supposedly delivered another performance of stultifying ineptitude.  Now it’s worth noting that I haven’t seen the whole game, because ITV Player was only able to deliver 16 minutes of poor quality footage before looping me back to the beginning again (if anyone from ITV is reading this – I tried two laptops and three browsers, so it’s not me, it’s you.  Sort it out, it’s a worldwide spectacle, and you had sufficient warning in the 2010 football World Cup, which you also butchered).  However, I have managed to track down the tries and I think a sense of perspective is needed.

England were, as the coaches and players have recognised, not as fluent as they would have liked.  They also continue to give away penalties like they’re on special offer, which will seriously hurt them later in the tournament if it is not rectified.  On the other hand, just about every learned commentator has spent the whole World Cup stating that the days of cannon-fodder minnows are over.  Even Pieter de Villiers has noticed it, a man for whom common sense and clarity of thought are as rare as a Mike Tindall sidestep.  Anyone who was expecting another 80-point drubbing, therefore, was already in the wrong ball park.

Georgia, in fact, were initially very good.  They had easily the best half of World Cup rugby in their history, with their outstanding physicality and England’s indiscipline keeping them more than in touch.  As the game wore on, England’s greater skill levels and superior conditioning saw them gain the upper-hand, and they ended up scoring six tries.  Both sides should really be satisfied, especially given that the Scots failed even to cross the try-line against the same outfit just four days earlier.

So yes, England will want to improve and, yes, their indiscipline is a serious problem.  But you still wouldn’t bet against them in the latter stages – especially if they can emulate Ireland’s inspirational example.

Categories: Australia · England · Georgia · Ireland · RWC 2011
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

T’ n’ T’ give England something to celebrate

August 28, 2011 · 2 Comments

Tuilagi had an explosive impact for England as they overcame Ireland in Dublin

Well it’s fair to say England have found their centres.  A man of the match display from Mike Tindall, celebrating a record-equalling 72nd cap, opened the way for Tuilagi to exhibit the full range of his talents, scoring a try and demonstrating his crushing defence.  As the luckless David Wallace will testify, when he hits, he hits hard.

Much more pleasing than either man’s moments of individual skill, however, is the efficacy of the combination that  England have found.  Whilst Tuilagi’s finish and Tindall’s beautifully-executed kick were impressive, their most telling endeavour was in fact defensive, when they collaborated to turnover Irish ball inside their own 22.  With the English line under severe pressure, Tindall stepped up and funneled the attack back into Tuilagi and Wilkinson (and, frankly, that’s a bad place to be funneled).  As the ensuing hit came in, the captain was on hand to steal the ball, and England survived unscathed.

This half pitch press was so well done that Ireland failed to score a try all game, and recorded no points in the second half, despite good territory and possession.  England’s defence was absolutely rock solid, with Tindall deployed at 13 to act a decision-maker whenever Ireland were on the ball.  Much as Tuilagi’s physical threat gave Tindall the space and time to create in attack, it was the older man’s much-vaunted reading of the game that gave Tuilagi plenty of opportunity to showcase his tackling ability.  Good centre partnerships are mutually beneficial, and that’s exactly what England seem to have found.

Elsewhere, the away performance was less unqualifiedly brilliant.  The forwards worked hard, with Thompson anchoring a powerful scrum, and their tackle count and work ethic were excellent.  Also pleasing was the line-out, in which each of Deacon, Palmer, Croft, Lawes and Shaw acted as jumpers.  However, the penalty count was a constant problem; Haskell’s carrying must be offset against a lack of control at the base of the scrum; and Lawes was largely anonymous.

In the backs, Wilkinson was below par.  Although he should keep his place for the first group game, his hands were not as slick as they can be and his kicking from hand was extremely variable.  It’s probably unfair to take his goal-kicking and defence for granted but one can’t help hoping for more.  Equally subdued was the returning Ashton, and Foden was again anonymous, with Armitage the only noticeable pace-merchant.  The defensive line was unbreachable but England must learn to use their midfield penetration to bring their back three into space.  Foden and Ashton form a world class partnership that is potentially lethal, and yet they did not break the line once between them and England seem to have forgotten how to use them.  If Tuilagi bulldozes his way across the gain line, England must aim to get Foden and Ashton running at forwards and threatening to break clear.  Drifting slightly and shipping the ball to Manu  resulted in a try yesterday, but it won’t against any defence worth its salt, and England’s second phase is blunt where it should be incisive.

Despite the inevitable talk of lessons to be learned, England will be hugely satisfied to have won this game.  A successful trip to Dublin has eluded the men in white since 2003, and they’ve only beaten Ireland once at Twickenham in that time.  To return to the scene of March’s brutal reality check and win convincingly is a significant achievement which very few predicted.  The pre-game talk of England aiming to lose well has been quickly forgotten, partly because of Ireland’s inability to improve on their troubled form, but Johnson will be delighted to have won comfortably.  Indeed, if Lawes hadn’t butchered – really butchered - a try on the right, and if Cueto hadn’t been lame when he intercepted Reddan’s pass, England would have won by a serious margin.  The Red Rose is in efficient, powerful, ominous shape, while the emerald green is in serious need of answers.

Categories: England · Ireland · Players · RWC 2011
Tagged: , , , , , , ,